Claris Law Legal Blogging Community

Recent Entries

RSS 2.0 feed Add to My Yahoo!
Add to Bloglines Add to your My Feedster
Add to your NewsGator My MSN
Qui Tam Whistleblower Lawyer

Legal Analysis

editor photo

Editor: Mike Bothwell
Profession: Qui Tam Attorney

September 03, 2008

By Julie Keeton Bracker

TrackBack (0)

Sixth Circuit Continues to Insist on "Claims" in U.S. ex rel. SNAPP, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company, 532 F.3d 496 (6th Cir. 2008)

Category: Legal Analysis

Once again, the stubborn judicial insistence on the magical "claim" to satisfy the requirements of Rule 9(b) has felled another detailed complaint. In this instance, despite a detailed exposé of a fraud by one of the participants, the relator's inability to produce a claim led to dismissal under Rule 9(b).

Continue reading "Sixth Circuit Continues to Insist on "Claims" in U.S. ex rel. SNAPP, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company, 532 F.3d 496 (6th Cir. 2008)"

September 02, 2008

By Jason Marcus

TrackBack (0)

Second Circuit Applies 30-day Filing Period for Notices of Appeal in Unintervened Qui Tams

Category: Legal Analysis

On August 19, 2008, the Second Circuit was faced with the issue of whether a notice of appeal for an unintervened qui tam must be filed within thirty days, as is generally applicable to civil actions, or within the sixty days allowed when the United States is a party. In U.S. ex. Rel. Eisenstein v. City of New York, the Court held that the United States is not a party to a qui tam action where it fails to intervene, and so the Relator must file his notice within thirty days. Because Eisenstein filed his notice of appeal fifty-four days after his complaint was dismissed, the Second Circuit dismissed the appeal as untimely.

Continue reading "Second Circuit Applies 30-day Filing Period for Notices of Appeal in Unintervened Qui Tams"

August 28, 2008

By Julie Keeton Bracker

TrackBack (0)

U.S. v. Bourseau et al.: Ninth Rejects Presentment Requirement Under FCA 3729(a)(7)

Category: Legal Analysis

In affirming a decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, the Ninth Circuit recently lined up with the Sixth to find that, by the plain language of the statute, presentment is not a requirement under § 3729(a)(7) but that materiality (using the "natural tendency test") is a requirement of the FCA. The Court also rejected an excessive fines challenge.

Continue reading "U.S. v. Bourseau et al.: Ninth Rejects Presentment Requirement Under FCA 3729(a)(7)"

April 13, 2007

By Mike Bothwell

TrackBack (0)

Bledsoe II

Category: Legal Analysis

Our firm recently completed oral arguments in the Sixth Circuit on the U.S. ex rel. Bledsoe case. This is the second time the Bledsoe case has been before the Sixth Circuit. The issues included FRCP Rule 9(b), alternate remedy, statute of limitations and the dismissal of all claims after determinations that certain claims were viable. In its portion of the argument, the Government stated that it did not like the Bledsoe I decision and asked that it be overturned. We hope to have the argument uploaded in a week or two. The opinion could come in the next few months or just before the end of the year.

July 17, 2006

By Mike Bothwell

TrackBack (0)

Whence the seal II

Category: Legal Analysis

In an earlier entry, I wrote about a possible qui tam that was going to be filed against manufacturers of electronic voting machines and wondered why that would be announced given the seal provision of the FCA. Now, I find that the lawsuit was filed, the date it was filed, and the name of at least one of the defendants. Did someone miss that seal provision?

July 05, 2006

By Mike Bothwell

TrackBack (0)

Whence the seal

Category: Legal Analysis

I first noticed the announcement of a to be filed qui tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act on Bradblog. It appears that as a follow up to the Rolling Stone article on the stolen 2004 election, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is going to file a False Claims Act lawsuit against the manufacturers of electronic voting machines.

Continue reading "Whence the seal"

June 13, 2006

By Mike Bothwell

TrackBack (0)

Serve or be dismissed

Category: Legal Analysis

The Fifth Circuit ruled yesterday that after the government declines a qui tam case and the matter is unsealed, the Relator must serve the complaint or face dismissal.

Continue reading "Serve or be dismissed"

May 15, 2006

By Mike Bothwell

TrackBack (0)

Heightened pleading in the Sixth Circuit

Category: Legal Analysis

In U.S. ex rel. Sanderson v. HCA-The Healthcare Company, Civil Action No. 04-6342, 2006 U.S. App. Lexis 11765 (6th Cir. May 12, 2006), it appears that another circuit court has embraced the silly heightened pleading standard first established by the absurd 2-1 decision in Clausen v. Laboratory Corp. of America, Inc., 290 F.3d 1301 (11th Cir. 2002).

Continue reading "Heightened pleading in the Sixth Circuit"

April 26, 2006

By Mike Bothwell

TrackBack (0)

Justice occasionally peaks over the blindfold

Category: Legal Analysis

The picture of justice blindfolded evokes the mistaken impression that all parties are equal before the law. When it comes to actions under the FCA, "it's good to be the King!"

Continue reading "Justice occasionally peaks over the blindfold"